Trump pulls US out of international Nuclear Disarmament. New arms production starts immediately

Doomsday Clock leaps toward midnight as Trump confirms US leaving INF Nuclear Disarmament agreement

Advertisement – Advertise here from OMR 100 / $275 USD

Al-Sahawat Times | Ethical Global News from Oman and UAE | Donate HERE 

Advertisement – Advertise here from OMR 100 / $275 USD

Trump has kicked up the mother of all shit storms this weekend, out matching even his own previous record for brain dead moronity.


After his racist rant where he referred to his black members of staff as being of “genetically low IQ” he went on to announce that the US is to start immediate production of new, super large, Nuclear, intern continental missiles aimed specifically at Iran, China. Russia and Europe.


Trump on Saturday said: ‘We’re going to terminate the nuclear agreement and we’re going to pull out.’


Trump has confirmed the US will leave the arms control treaty with Russia dating from the cold war that has kept nuclear missiles out of Europe and stopped production of new stock pile or research into more advanced missiles as well as requiring pre determined numbers of nuclear missiles to be destroyed each year, for three decades.


“We’ll have to develop those weapons,” the president told reporters in Nevada after a rally.


“We’re going to terminate the agreement and we’re going to pull out.”


Trump was referring to the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces treaty (INF), which banned ground-launch nuclear missiles with ranges from 500km to 5’500km.


Signed by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, it led to nearly 2’700 short- and medium-range missiles being eliminated, and an end to a dangerous standoff between US Pershing and cruise missiles and Soviet SS-20 missiles in Europe and the Caribbean. Also known as the Cuban Missile Crisis.


Trump’s third national security adviser, John Bolton, a longstanding opponent of arms control treaties, and apparent fan of total global armageddon, was pushing for US withdrawal.


The US says Russia has been violating the INF agreement with the development and deployment of a new non nuclear cruise missile.


Under the terms of the treaty, it would take six months for US withdrawal to take effect.


North Korea, China, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Israel, UK and France all vowed to start rapid mass production of high-tech long range nuclear war heads if the US violates the treaty.


US hawks have also argued that the INF treaty ties the country’s hands in its strategic rivalry with China in the Pacific, with no response to Chinese medium-range missiles that could threaten US bases, allies and shipping in US and UK occupied Chinese sovereign territory.


Bolton and the top arms control adviser in the National Security Council (NSC), Tim Morrison, are also opposed to the extension of another major pillar of arms control, the 2010 New Start agreement with Russia, which limited the number of deployed strategic warheads on either side to 1’550.


That agreement, signed by Barack Obama and Dmitri Medvedev, then president of Russia, is due to expire in 2021.


“This is the most severe crisis in nuclear arms control since the 1980s,” said Malcolm Chalmers, the deputy director general of the Royal United Services Institute. “If the INF treaty collapses, and with the New Start treaty on strategic arms due to expire in 2021, the world could be left without any limits on the nuclear arsenals of nuclear states for the first time since 1972.”


Speaking to reporters in Nevada, Trump said: “Russia has violated the agreement. They’ve been violating it for many years and I don’t know why President Obama didn’t negotiate or pull out.


“We’re not going to let them violate a nuclear agreement and do weapons [SIC] and we’re not allowed to. We’re the ones that have stayed in the agreement and we’ve honoured the agreement but Russia has not unfortunately honoured the agreement so we’re going to terminate the agreement, we’re going to pull out.”


It should be noted that the US and UK have repeatedly and openly violated the agreement with nuclear testing and spent nuclear missiles launched in Bosnia, Serbia, Syria, Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.


Asked to clarify, the president said: “Unless Russia comes to us and China comes to us and they all come to us and they say, ‘Let’s all of us get smart and let’s none of us develop those weapons,’ but if Russia’s doing it and if China’s doing it and we’re adhering to the agreement, that’s unacceptable. So we have a tremendous amount of more money to play with with our military.”


US actually has a much smaller army and military budget than China, Turkey, Pakistan or Russia.


Jeffrey Lewis, the director of the East Asia nonproliferation program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, said:


“This is a colossal mistake. Russia gets to violate the treaty and Trump takes the blame.


“I doubt very much that the US will deploy much that would have been prohibited by the treaty. Russia, though, will go all out.”


Especially as the west has not adhered to the agreement with Russia over East European neutrality and EU and NATO expansion.


Russian state news agencies on Saturday cited a foreign ministry source as saying Washington’s move to pull out of the treaty is motivated by a dream of a single global superpower, a “new world order.”


“The main motive is a dream of a unipolar world. Will it come true? No,” a foreign ministry source told Ria Novosti state news agency.


The official said that Russia has “many times publicly denounced the US policy course towards dismantling the nuclear deal”.


Russia is an avid opposition to the “new world order” lead by the US, Israel, UK, France and Neatherlands.


The US envoy to Nato even threatened Russia: “Stop developing missiles or we will take them out.”


Washington “has approached this step over the course of many years by deliberately and step-by-step destroying the basis for the agreement,” the official said, quoted by all of Russia’s three main news agencies.


“This decision is part of the US policy course to withdraw from those international legal agreements that place equal responsibilities on it and its partners and make vulnerable its concept of its own ‘exceptionalism’.”


Russian senator Alexei Pushkov wrote on Twitter that the move was “the second powerful blow against the whole system of strategic stability in the world, with the first being Washington’s 2001 withdrawal from the anti-ballistic missile treaty. And again the initiator of the dissolution of the agreement is the US.” Pushkov wrote.


The Pentagon has been generally supportive of the INF treaty but defense secretary James Mattis warned other Nato ministers earlier this month it would no longer be tenable if Russia did not withdraw its Novator ground-based missile, which the US has argued for nearly four years violates the INF range restrictions.


Nato ministers issued a joint statement saying the INF agreement “has been crucial to Euro-Atlantic security and we remain fully committed to the preservation of this landmark arms control treaty”. But they urged Russia to release secret intelligence proving the maximum potential capabilities of its new missiles.


The Chinese arsenal has also been a source of concern for the US Pacific Command. Its former commander, Adm Harry Harris, told the Senate in March: “We have no ground-based capability that can threaten China because of, among other things, our rigid adherence, and rightfully so, to the treaty that we sign on to, the INF treaty.”


The US seeks to actively and directly threaten mainland China with new Nuclear warheads.


Lewis disagreed that the INF leaves the US at a significant disadvantage in the Pacific.


“The China stuff is nonsense,” he said. “INF does not prohibit sea- and air-based systems, niether does it prohibit South Korea and Japan from developing long-range missiles. If China were a real problem, the US and its allies could have acted long ago.”



Alexandra Bell, a former senior state department official and now senior policy director at the Centre for Arms Control & Non-Proliferation, said: “When problems arise in arms control, you work and fix them. What shocks me is that this president who is constantly telling us he is deal-maker has failed utterly to save Reagan’s nuclear legacy. He did nothing with his relationship with Putin. There were trades to be made to fix this treaty and he couldn’t pull it off.”


She added: “Why would the North Koreans have any reason to believe in any deal made with this president, with Bolton whispering in his ear and war mongering.”


Trump’s Presidential and corporate deals have been rendered utterly worthless as he has proven himself time and time again to be the exact opposite of a man of his word.


Trump’s own chief of staff famously refered to him as “a total f***ing idiot”.

Since you’re here …

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading Al-Sahawat Times than ever but advertising revenues across the global media industry are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a total paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Al-Sahawat Times’ independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe truly ethical media and an unbias perspective really matters.

“I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.”

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, the future of ethical media and the futures of our staff and their families would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support Al-Sahawat Times and it only takes a minute. Thank you. 


This story is available on:


Talk to a journalist



Follow Al-Sahawat Times

Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On TwitterVisit Us On LinkedinVisit Us On YoutubeVisit Us On Instagram
Read it on Apple News

?Read it on FLIPBOARD | Journalist

About the Author

Michael Al-Said
News correspondent for Al-Sahawat Times since 2012