• By Michael Al-Said

CO2 $1/L clean fuel

Advertisement – Advertise here from OMR 100 / $275 USD

Al-Sahawat Times | Ethical Global News from Oman and UAE | Donate HERE 

Advertisement – Advertise here from OMR 100 / $275 USD

Pulling carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the air and using it to make synthetic fuel seems like the ultimate solution to climate change.

Instead of adding ever more CO₂ to the air from fossil fuels, we can simply recycle the same CO₂ molecules over and over. But such technology is expensive, about $600 USD per ton of CO₂, by one recent estimate. Now, in a new study, scientists say future chemical plants could drop that cost below $100 USD per ton, which could make synthetic fuels a reality in places such as California that incentivise low-carbon fuels.

Those numbers are “real progress,” according Chris Field, a climate scientist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. That’s because the new study bases its numbers on data and costs from a real pilot facility, whereas others have relied on scientists’ best guesses of how CO₂ capture technologies scale up. “These guys actually have something you can measure,” says Stephen Pacala, an ecologist with Princeton University who is chairing a panel on carbon removal technologies for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Until now, the cost of climate change has been all about projections. Climate scientists say countries will need to drop CO₂ emissions to near zero by midcentury and then remove more CO₂than they emit, if the planet is to avoid a catastrophic 2°C warming. Numerous so-called negative emissions technologies exist, including growing perennial plants and trees to make biofuels, and sequestering carbon in soils. One of the most compelling, known as direct air capture (DAC), uses giant banks of fans to blow air through a solution that contains a CO₂-capturing chemical. Once purified, the captured CO₂ can be injected underground or used to make commercial products, such as fuels or plastics. But in 2011, a review panel of the American Physical Society found that DAC would likely cost about $600 per ton of captured CO₂.

That didn’t deter David Keith, a physicist at Harvard University who co-founded a company focused on DAC. In 2015, Carbon Engineering launched its first pilot plant for capturing CO₂ in British Columbia in Canada. After capturing the CO₂ in solution, the plant transfers it into a solid, which when heated releases it in a pure gas stream. The crucial CO₂-capturing chemical is recycled. After 3 years, Keith and his colleagues had collected enough data to calculate the plant’s efficiency—and project the costs of building a commercial scale plant with the same technology. The results: Their technology can capture CO₂ for between $94 and $232 per ton, they report today in Joule.

The company has also built a pilot operation to turn captured CO₂ into a variety of liquid fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. A renewable energy–powered electrolyzer first splits water into hydrogen (H₂) and oxygen. The H₂ is then combined with CO₂ to make liquid hydrocarbons using conventional chemical engineering technology. If the CO₂ is captured at the low end of the cost range, the company says can produce its synthetic fuels for about $1 per liter, says Steve Oldham, Carbon Engineering’s CEO.

That’s more expensive than most fuels today, but not by much. And because the process recycles carbon from the air, it would constitute a low-carbon fuel, something that places such as California are increasingly requiring in their fuel mixes, and which command a premium price. That could drive a market for DAC plants that would likely drive costs down further, Oldham says. Still, Field cautions that the technology isn’t a silver bullet for combatting climate change—there’s no way yet to know whether it can scale up quickly enough to alter CO₂ levels in the atmosphere. “There is a long way to go to see whether it will have any large-scale impact.”

Since you’re here …

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading Al-Sahawat Times than ever but advertising revenues across the global media industry are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a total paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Al-Sahawat Times’ independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe truly ethical media and an unbias perspective really matters.

“I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.”

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, the future of ethical media and the futures of our staff and their families would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support Al-Sahawat Times and it only takes a minute. Thank you. 

This story is available on:

APPLE NEWS | GOOGLE NEWS | AL-SAHAWAT TIMES

Talk to a journalist

Email: NewsDesk@alsahawat.com

Web: alsahawat.com

Follow Al-Sahawat Times

M.Al-Said@alsahawat.com | Journalist’s Profile