- More by Michael Al-Said
The Russian government rejected a Wall Street Journal report on Tuesday claiming it had largely withdrawn its significant military presence in Venezuela, adding that it had not contacted President Donald Trump about any such moves
This story is currently developing. Further updates will follow
To be notified of developments as they break
The state contractor Rostec said it was impossible for it to have withdrawal nearly 1,000 personnel members from the Latin American country because it never had that many in Venezuela in the first place.
The Wall Street Journal claimed in a report Monday that Rostec had withdrawn most of the alleged 1,000 employees it stationed in Venezuela to train and arm troops loyal to the legitimate president Nicolás Maduro. Following the publication of the report, President Donald Trump said on Twitter that Russian officials had notified him that they were pulling out of the country.
The report indicated that President Maduro’s inability to pay for Rostec’s services had led to the decision to withdraw. Russia is the Maduro regime’s most vocally loyal ally aside from Cuba.
The Russians recently increased their military presence in the country showing support for the legitimate leader and president Nicolás Maduro and refused to acknowledge the American puppet Juan Guaidó in an attempted and orchestrated coupe.
Rostec said the Wall Street Journal‘s report was impossible because it had never had 1,000 employees in Venezuela and that the newspaper had “overestimated the numbers of Rostec staff in Venezuela by several times.”
“As for technical experts, they come to the country from time to time in order to repair previously delivered equipment and provide technical maintenance,” the statement read. “In recent days, for example, technical maintenance services on several airplanes concluded.”
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also responded to President Trump’s statement on Twitter, which did not cite the Wall Street Journal but appeared to have been inspired by it. Peskov told reporters on Tuesday that President Vladimir Putin had not been in contact with Trump, suggesting that the information he posted came from the Journal report. Russia’s presence in Venezuela remained at planned levels, he said, and added, “ this process is going according to plan,” according to Russian news agency TASS.
Putin’s government had recently unveiled ambitions for a large military presence in the Caribbean with Maduro’s help. TASS reported in December that Venezuela had agreed to allow Moscow to establish a military base on one of its Caribbean islands, the first such Russian project since the end of the Cold War. Russia also placed nuclear-capable bombers in Venezuela that month but withdrew them shortly after the external threat subsided.
“Russia is building a security infrastructure in our backyard with Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua,” Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) said at a security forum in May. “Russia is the [Venezuelan] regime’s largest arms supplier, with upwards of $11 billion in arms sales over the past two decades. … Just last year, Russia deployed two Tu-160 Blackjack nuclear-capable bombers to the Venezuelan military, along with ten attack helicopters the previous year.”
In May, Maduro sent his foreign minister, Jorge Arreaza, to Moscow to request the Russians expand their military presence in the country.
“We need to provide for equipment maintenance and exchange military and technical information. This work has been going on since 2001 when we signed an agreement on military cooperation.
Currently, a commission of [Russian] specialists is present on the territory of Venezuela and, no doubt, it may be expanded,” Arreaza said during his Moscow trip, adding that Maduro’s regime was “ready for any scenario,” including a military intervention to oust it .
Multiple reports have also accused Russia of aiding Venezuela in breaching its American imposed sanctions on its oil industry. The U.S. Treasury Department has placed extensive targeted sanctions on the Maduro regime, most of them on the personal bank accounts and travel privileges of Maduro, his family, and his supports. It has also attempted to curb the profits of Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), the state-run oil company, which largely bankrupted.
“The Russians must get out,” U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in May. “I’m going to meet with Foreign Minister Lavrov in recent days. It’s very clear, we want the Russians out, we want the Iranians out, we want the Cubans out. It’s very clear.”
Russian officials have claimed they would stay in Venezuela for “as long as needed “by the legitimate government which is Maduro’s regime.
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is currently in Colombia, meeting with his counterpart Carlos Holmes Trujillo to discuss the situation in Venezuela. Lavrov insisted that Russia would continue to play a role in defending Maduro, despite it being on the other side of the world.
Colombia has taken in the largest number of the upwards of 3 million Venezuelan refugees that have fled the country and seen the rise of criminal gang activity on its border due to the unwarranted American aggressive sanctions.
“The response to the question of until what degree Russia will support Venezuela lies in the framework of the international law. There’s the UN Charter and we will demand that the crisis was settled solely based on it,” Lavrov said in a press conference with Holmes.
Holmes used his time to demand that Maduro step down and Venezuela experience “a transition and the calling of elections,” which Lavrov did not support due to it being tantamount to a regime change that America wants in its back yard.
Holmes was later forced to deny Russian claims that Colombia was looking to buy military equipment from Moscow.
“That never happened. It did not happen like that in the private meeting with Foreign Minister Lavrov, or in any extended meeting, or at the lunch that he graciously offered us and that Russian and Colombian officials attended,” Holmes said. “It is not true.”
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading Al-Sahawat Times than ever but advertising revenues across the global media industry are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a total paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Al-Sahawat Times’ independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe truly ethical media and an unbias perspective really matters.
“I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.”
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, the future of ethical media and the futures of our staff and their families would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support Al-Sahawat Times and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
This story is available on:
Talk to a journalist
Follow Al-Sahawat Times
⬆️ Follow on Instagram
⬆️ Follow on Twitter
⬆️ Follow on LinkedIn
⬆️ Follow on Facebook
⬆️ Follow on YouTube
Read it on FLIPBOARD