UK to stop immigrants from appealing their deportation via judicial review
UK | LAW | IMMIGRATION
Both immigrants and refugees are to be stripped of the right to appeal deportation orders in the High Court via judicial review, under a new crackdown to speed up “removals”. Which the European Union has expressed “deep concerns” over, after discovering EU citizens are being held in immigration detention camps in the UK.
Judicial Review Bill will overturn a Supreme Court ruling, which allowed tribunal decisions to be put forward before the High Court. Around 700 such appeals are pursued every year. The UK government admits it does not actually know the success rate of such cases, the Queen’s Speech stating: “We are investigating how many of these cases result in a successful outcome for the claimant.”
The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) said in a statement: “a grave injustice, not least because the Home Office regularly gets decisions wrong. People seeking protection in the UK deserve to have their voices heard, and their claims calmy and fairly assessed.” said Minnie Rahman, the organisation’s campaigns director:
Nazek Ramadan, director of Migrant Voice, said: “The government’s plans mean that a significant number of those who would have won their claim in the High Court could be deported. The government is taking legal rights away from people who need protection, with individuals deported to countries where they are at risk of harm or persecution. What does this say about us as a country?”
Many see the legislation as an attack on the power of the people to mount legal challenges, in direct revenge for a series of high profile, public, embarrassing court defeats during the Brexit harakiri.
Theresa May was taken to court for invoking the Article 50 exit notice without MPs’ approval and Boris Johnson, beside his long list of court cases, was humiliated when judges ruled his shutdown of parliament was illegal.
A claim that just 0.22 per cent of immigration judicial reviews are successful, made by the government in a review for the government, has been widely discredited, lawyers say. In fact, up to one in 11 was reported to result in victories, a figure that is now thought to be potentially higher when factoring in out of court settlements, after more complete data was used.
© 2021 Al-Sahawat Times, Printed and Distributed by IPMG, an Al-Said Group entity.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading Al-Sahawat Times than ever but advertising revenues across the global media industry are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a total paywall. We want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Al-Sahawat Times’ independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe truly ethical media and an unbias perspective really matters.
“I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.”
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, the future of ethical media and the futures of our staff and their families would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support Al-Sahawat Times and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
This story is available on:
Talk to a journalist
Follow Al-Sahawat Times
⬆️ Follow on Instagram
⬆️ Follow on Twitter
⬆️ Follow on LinkedIn
⬆️ Follow on Facebook
⬆️ Follow on YouTube
Read it on FLIPBOARD